touch-packages team mailing list archive

[Andy Whitcroft <apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Public bug reported:

18:33:32            wxl | hey ya'll lubuntu's lacking alternates since the 5th. here's the latest logs
                        | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/lubuntu/xenial/daily-20160208.log
18:36:46       cjwatson | apw: ^- so this is because initramfs-tools-bin wants to move to optional, http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/priority-mismatches.html -
                        | but I think that might actually be a bug.  shouldn't initramfs-tools-core depend on initramfs-tools-bin?  it seems to still use wait-for-root at
                        | least

** Affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Critical
     Assignee: Andy Whitcroft (apw)
         Status: In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1543244

Title:
  initramfs-tools: initramfs-tools-core should depend on initramfs-
  tools-bin

Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  18:33:32            wxl | hey ya'll lubuntu's lacking alternates since the 5th. here's the latest logs
                          | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/lubuntu/xenial/daily-20160208.log
  18:36:46       cjwatson | apw: ^- so this is because initramfs-tools-bin wants to move to optional, http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/priority-mismatches.html -
                          | but I think that might actually be a bug.  shouldn't initramfs-tools-core depend on initramfs-tools-bin?  it seems to still use wait-for-root at
                          | least

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1543244/+subscriptions