← Back to team overview

touch-packages team mailing list archive

[Bug 1399597] Re: unity-scope-click autopkgtests with a package installation failure because of oxide codecs

 

This was now fixed by moving oxideqt-codecs-extra from sdk to touch meta
package.

Remaining issues:
- unity-scope-click should query the available frameworks manually (or via click if a feature arrives) instead of depending on ubuntu-sdk-libs directly
- oxide-qt could optionally have an alternatives system to managing the codecs packages instead of conflicting, to prevent possible similar future issues

** Summary changed:

- The last oxide upload breaks autopkgtests with a package installation failure
+ unity-scope-click autopkgtests with a package installation failure because of oxide codecs

** Changed in: oxide-qt (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Critical => Medium

** Changed in: unity-scope-click (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Critical => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-touch-meta in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1399597

Title:
  unity-scope-click autopkgtests with a package installation failure
  because of oxide codecs

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in oxide-qt package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in ubuntu-touch-meta package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in unity-scope-click package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  The last packaging change upload
  (https://code.launchpad.net/~bzoltan/oxide/packaging.vivid-improved-
  conflicts/+merge/243515) broke autopkgtests of many packages that try
  to install Oxide during preparation of the environment.

  See for example https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/vivid-adt-qtcreator-
  plugin-ubuntu/lastBuild/ARCH=amd64,label=adt/console

  This prevents migration of several packages.

  ---
  Unpacking oxideqt-codecs:amd64 (1.3.5-0ubuntu4) ...
  dpkg: considering removing oxideqt-codecs:amd64 in favour of oxideqt-codecs-extra:amd64 ...
  dpkg: oxideqt-codecs:amd64 is not properly installed; ignoring any dependencies on it
  dpkg: yes, will remove oxideqt-codecs:amd64 in favour of oxideqt-codecs-extra:amd64
  ---
  Setting up oxideqt-codecs-extra:amd64 (1.3.5-0ubuntu4) ...
  dpkg: error processing package oxideqt-codecs (--configure):
   no package named `oxideqt-codecs' is installed, cannot configure
  ---
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   oxideqt-codecs
  E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

  Because of this it'll be reverted until a better solution is offered.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1399597/+subscriptions