← Back to team overview

touch-packages team mailing list archive

[Bug 711061] Re: [MIR] openjpeg

 

Can this be re-checked on the current version (1.5.2)? Debian has this
version in Main and it is synced to Ubuntu. Debian is using this version
for Ghostscript 9.15 which I have synced into Ubuntu so that Ubuntu has
the current Ghostscript and minimum delta to the Debian package.

** Summary changed:

- [MIR] libopenjpeg2
+ [MIR] openjpeg

** Changed in: openjpeg (Ubuntu)
       Status: Won't Fix => New

** Changed in: openjpeg (Ubuntu)
    Milestone: None => ubuntu-15.04

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openjpeg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711061

Title:
  [MIR] openjpeg

Status in openjpeg package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  libopenjpeg should be included in main because compiling poppler with
  --enable-openjpeg in debian/rules gives poppler greater functionality
  (please see bug 710412). Since this change to /debian/rules adds
  libopenjpeg as a build-dep to poppler, which is in main, libopenjpeg
  must also be in main.

  Main inclusion requirements:

  1. It is already in the universe.

  2. The package is a new build-dep, and has a large user base (think
  evince).

  3. Searching http://secunia.com/advisories/search/ for libopenjpeg
  gave zero results.

  4. Libopenjpeg has no current Ubuntu bugs (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/maverick/+source/openjpeg)
       in the Debian bug tracking system libopenjpeg has 1 open bug (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=libopenjpeg2), this is an encoding bug, but the main use for this package will be decoding.
       Libopenjpeg does not require any configuration or debconf questions.

  5. N/A

  6. All build-deps are already included in main.

  7. I am afraid that this is a bit over my head, hopefully someone else
  could ensure that this package meets the requirments here. Based on
  its long inclusion in Debian and Ubuntu I think that it should be
  alright here.

  8.This is a fairly simple program not needed too much maintenance, as
  shown by the bug reports.

  9. The package title and description seem to be in order.

  
  My only final comments are that I am sorry this may not be quite the normal MIR, but I am just a member of bug control, not a dev. Also, any help and advise along the way would be much appreciated.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjpeg/+bug/711061/+subscriptions