touch-packages team mailing list archive

[Tom Van Braeckel <1252121@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This works fine for me, with wicd on Ubuntu Utopic.

Actually, I don't see why someone (justin parker?) marked wicd as being
affected, because I don't see anyone mentioning wicd in this report, and
neither in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd-
shim/+bug/1184262 and neither in any of the duplicates.

Marked as Invalid, just let me know if there's a real issue with wicd
here.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd-shim in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1252121

Title:
  missing PrepareForSleep signal after resuming, causing networking to
  stay disabled

Status in NetworkManager:
  New
Status in wicd:
  Invalid
Status in systemd-shim package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in systemd-shim source package in Saucy:
  Won't Fix
Status in systemd-shim source package in Trusty:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  As per request from bug #1184262, this is a new report, along with
  dbus (to be attached)

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
  Package: systemd-services 204-0ubuntu19
  Uname: Linux 3.12.0-custom x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.1
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Sun Nov 17 20:24:41 2013
  MarkForUpload: True
  SourcePackage: systemd
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-10-17 (31 days ago)

  SRU INFORMATION:
  FIX: https://github.com/desrt/systemd-shim/commit/9e1ebe3ab (in trusty already)

  Regression potential: Low. Flushing the session bus was introduced in
  version 4 and is obviously bogus as in a system D-BUS service there is
  no session bus. This causes lots of confusing error messages and
  unnecessary overhead like trying to start dbus-launch. Flushing the
  system bus is low-risk, in most cases it's a no-op and it would
  otherwise prevent losing signals after waking up. No known
  regressions.

  TEST CASE: Run several suspend/resume cycles with the lid, session
  indicator menu, and verify that the network comes back up. It is known
  that this fix is necessary but not sufficient, so it is not expected
  to fix all cases. But it should not make things worse, so if network
  now does not come up any more on a machine where it previously worked
  this would count as failure/regression.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/network-manager/+bug/1252121/+subscriptions