touch-packages team mailing list archive
-
touch-packages team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #56678
[Bug 1252121] Re: missing PrepareForSleep signal after resuming, causing networking to stay disabled
14.04.2 had been just released with new kernel 3.16 Is the big still
persists? And what is wicd? Package that fixes bug ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd-shim in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1252121
Title:
missing PrepareForSleep signal after resuming, causing networking to
stay disabled
Status in NetworkManager:
New
Status in wicd:
Invalid
Status in systemd-shim package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Status in systemd-shim source package in Saucy:
Won't Fix
Status in systemd-shim source package in Trusty:
Confirmed
Bug description:
As per request from bug #1184262, this is a new report, along with
dbus (to be attached)
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
Package: systemd-services 204-0ubuntu19
Uname: Linux 3.12.0-custom x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.1
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun Nov 17 20:24:41 2013
MarkForUpload: True
SourcePackage: systemd
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-10-17 (31 days ago)
SRU INFORMATION:
FIX: https://github.com/desrt/systemd-shim/commit/9e1ebe3ab (in trusty already)
Regression potential: Low. Flushing the session bus was introduced in
version 4 and is obviously bogus as in a system D-BUS service there is
no session bus. This causes lots of confusing error messages and
unnecessary overhead like trying to start dbus-launch. Flushing the
system bus is low-risk, in most cases it's a no-op and it would
otherwise prevent losing signals after waking up. No known
regressions.
TEST CASE: Run several suspend/resume cycles with the lid, session
indicator menu, and verify that the network comes back up. It is known
that this fix is necessary but not sufficient, so it is not expected
to fix all cases. But it should not make things worse, so if network
now does not come up any more on a machine where it previously worked
this would count as failure/regression.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/network-manager/+bug/1252121/+subscriptions