touch-packages team mailing list archive
-
touch-packages team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #57130
Re: [Bug 1409483] Re: FTBFS: (package) on 32 bit arch's
I'm wondering why you added all those libFLAC.so.8 symbols to the
libflac++6 symbol file, seems quite unneeded.
It appears you used all the common symbols + the 32bit specific ones? Is
that any better than just using the common symbols or some other solution?
On 02/22/2015 01:42 PM, Phil Pratt-Szeliga wrote:
> Possible fix [1] updates symbol files of libflac++6. This problem is
> from libflac converting long to long long. On a 32bit system long will
> evaluate to int32 and on 64bit it will evaulate to int64. The change by
> libflac is attempting to make the values int64 on all architectures.
>
> If the libflac++6 symbols change, what repercussions does this have to
> the rest of the packages? Maybe just reverting the libflac long longs to
> long would be the best fix.
>
> [1] https://code.launchpad.net/~pcpratts/ubuntu/vivid/flac/fix-for-
> ftbfs/+merge/250557
>
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to flac in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1409483
Title:
FTBFS: (package) on 32 bit arch's
Status in One Hundred Papercuts:
Confirmed
Status in flac package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Status in flac package in Debian:
New
Bug description:
libflac6++ produces a slightly different set of symbols for 64 & 32 bit. This currently causes 32 arch builds to fail as current symbols file is for 64 bit.
This will not be confined to libflac++6, maybe? all future c++ with symbols files?
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.04
Package: libflac++6 1.3.1-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.18.0-8.9-generic 3.18.1
Uname: Linux 3.18.0-8-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.15.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: Unity
Date: Sun Jan 11 11:54:49 2015
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-11-16 (56 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 15.04 "Vivid Vervet" - Alpha amd64 (20141114)
SourcePackage: flac
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1409483/+subscriptions
References