touch-packages team mailing list archive

[Phil Pratt-Szeliga <1409483@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> I'm wondering why you added all those libFLAC.so.8 symbols to the
> libflac++6 symbol file

Sorry about that, this was my first time using debcommit and I wasn't
able to view the differences before submitting.

I am going to write a program that can search http://archive.ubuntu.com/
to find a package that depends on libflac++6 and try to compile it with
the new symbols. If it doesn't compile this should be an update to the
major version of the package upstream.

** Changed in: flac (Ubuntu)
     Assignee: (unassigned) => Phil Pratt-Szeliga (pcpratts)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to flac in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1409483

Title:
  FTBFS: (package) on 32 bit arch's

Status in One Hundred Papercuts:
  Confirmed
Status in flac package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in flac package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  libflac6++ produces a slightly different set of symbols for 64 & 32 bit. This currently causes 32 arch builds to fail as current symbols file is for 64 bit.
  This will not be confined to libflac++6, maybe? all future c++ with symbols files?

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.04
  Package: libflac++6 1.3.1-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.18.0-8.9-generic 3.18.1
  Uname: Linux 3.18.0-8-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.15.1-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Sun Jan 11 11:54:49 2015
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-11-16 (56 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 15.04 "Vivid Vervet" - Alpha amd64 (20141114)
  SourcePackage: flac
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1409483/+subscriptions