touch-packages team mailing list archive

[Barry Warsaw <1431696@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

There are two different modules inside the systemimage package,
systemimage/udm.py and systemimage/curl.py.  I wonder if it makes sense
to separate those into different binary packages, e.g. system-image-curl
and system-image-udm.  Then the individual binary packages can depend on
the proper dependency and we can switch system-image-common to depending
on system-image-udm | system-image-curl

Or is that too much complexity?


** Changed in: system-image (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: system-image (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: system-image (Ubuntu)
     Assignee: (unassigned) => Barry Warsaw (barry)

** Changed in: system-image (Ubuntu)
    Milestone: None => ubuntu-15.04

** Tags added: client

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to system-image in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1431696

Title:
  Please make "ubuntu-download-manager" a or dependency for 3.0

Status in system-image package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  The current system-image-common package in the
  https://launchpad.net/~barry/+archive/ubuntu/systemimage/+build/7052762
  PPA contains: "Depends: ..., ubuntu-download-manager, ...". For snappy
  we would like to have "ubuntu-download-manager | python3-pycurl" to
  avoid pulling in this extra dependency.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/system-image/+bug/1431696/+subscriptions