touch-packages team mailing list archive
-
touch-packages team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #62822
[Bug 1431696] Re: Please make "ubuntu-download-manager" a or dependency for 3.0
There are two different modules inside the systemimage package,
systemimage/udm.py and systemimage/curl.py. I wonder if it makes sense
to separate those into different binary packages, e.g. system-image-curl
and system-image-udm. Then the individual binary packages can depend on
the proper dependency and we can switch system-image-common to depending
on system-image-udm | system-image-curl
Or is that too much complexity?
** Changed in: system-image (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: system-image (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: system-image (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Barry Warsaw (barry)
** Changed in: system-image (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-15.04
** Tags added: client
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to system-image in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1431696
Title:
Please make "ubuntu-download-manager" a or dependency for 3.0
Status in system-image package in Ubuntu:
Triaged
Bug description:
The current system-image-common package in the
https://launchpad.net/~barry/+archive/ubuntu/systemimage/+build/7052762
PPA contains: "Depends: ..., ubuntu-download-manager, ...". For snappy
we would like to have "ubuntu-download-manager | python3-pycurl" to
avoid pulling in this extra dependency.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/system-image/+bug/1431696/+subscriptions
References