touch-packages team mailing list archive
-
touch-packages team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #68530
[Bug 1020210] Re: Race condition using ATOMIC_FASTBINS in _int_free causes crash or heap corruption
A Canonical customer has been running this exact patch (character-
identical) in production for a good while, and reports no regressions,
and that it solved their problem.
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to eglibc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020210
Title:
Race condition using ATOMIC_FASTBINS in _int_free causes crash or heap
corruption
Status in Embedded GLIBC:
Fix Released
Status in eglibc package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in eglibc source package in Precise:
Fix Released
Bug description:
[Impact]
* This bug is likely to cause a crash with a SEGV in multithreading
applications doing many memory deallocations with ATOMIC_FASTBINS
feature enabled.
[Test Case]
* Since this is a race condition issue there is no simple path of reproducing it, however one could try to follow the instructions in the upstream bug (https://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15073):
https://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7331
[Regression Potential]
* This issue has been merged upstream with no further issues
reported.
[Other Info]
* Original bug description:
We have an application which makes heavy allocation and de-allocation
demands from multiple threads. We run this application continuously
on many servers, and once every several CPU months or years, we were
getting a crash in _int_free that did not look like vanilla heap
corruption. I believe I have narrowed it down to a race condition in
_int_free due to the ATOMIC_FASTBINS feature. Basically, in the
lockless FASTBIN _int_free path, a chunk is pulled into a local
variable with the intent to add it to the fastbins list. However, the
heap consolidation/trim code can race with this, and can coalesce the
entire block and/or give it back to the OS before _int_free has a
chance to try and store it into the fastbins list.
The problem is very challenging to reproduce in situ, but using gdb I
have a recipe which demonstrates the crash 100% of the time on my
12.04 x64 system running eglibc 2.15. It relies on malloc_trim,
although in our in situ data, the consolidation is triggered as a
result of a normal free. malloc_trim is just easier to control.
While I am not a glibc developer, I could not see any easy ways to fix
the situation shy of disabling ATOMIC_FASTBINS.
I am attaching the reproduction source. Other pertinent information
follows:
> jpieper@calculon:~/downloads$ lsb_release -rd
> Description: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
> Release: 12.04
> jpieper@calculon:~/downloads$ apt-cache policy libc6
> libc6:
> Installed: 2.15-0ubuntu10
> Candidate: 2.15-0ubuntu10
> Version table:
> *** 2.15-0ubuntu10 0
> 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages
> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
What I expect: I expect the attached application, when run using the gdb script in the comments, to complete with no failures.
What happened: A SIGSEGV after the final continue.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/eglibc/+bug/1020210/+subscriptions