touch-packages team mailing list archive

[Launchpad Bug Tracker <1440501@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: akonadi (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1440501

Title:
  Can not load mysql-akonadi apparmor profile

Status in akonadi package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in apparmor package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Apparmor fails to start witch exit code 123, because it can not load
  the mysql-akonadi profile:

  % sudo systemctl status apparmor -l      
  ● apparmor.service - LSB: AppArmor initialization
     Loaded: loaded (/etc/init.d/apparmor)
     Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since So 2015-04-05 12:29:33 CEST; 55s ago
       Docs: man:systemd-sysv-generator(8)
    Process: 13906 ExecStart=/etc/init.d/apparmor start (code=exited, status=123)

  Apr 05 12:29:33 benediktZ50-70 apparmor[13906]: Skipping profile in /etc/apparmor.d/disable: usr.bin.firefox
  Apr 05 12:29:33 benediktZ50-70 apparmor[13906]: AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.mysqld-akonadi in /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.mysqld-akonadi at line 31: Could not open 'local/usr.sbin.mysqld-akonadi'
  Apr 05 12:29:33 benediktZ50-70 apparmor[13906]: Skipping profile in /etc/apparmor.d/disable: usr.bin.firefox
  Apr 05 12:29:33 benediktZ50-70 apparmor[13906]: Skipping profile in /etc/apparmor.d/disable: usr.sbin.rsyslogd
  Apr 05 12:29:33 benediktZ50-70 apparmor[13906]: AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.mysqld-akonadi in /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.mysqld-akonadi at line 31: Could not open 'local/usr.sbin.mysqld-akonadi'
  Apr 05 12:29:33 benediktZ50-70 apparmor[13906]: ...fail!
  Apr 05 12:29:33 benediktZ50-70 systemd[1]: apparmor.service: control process exited, code=exited status=123
  Apr 05 12:29:33 benediktZ50-70 systemd[1]: Failed to start LSB: AppArmor initialization.
  Apr 05 12:29:33 benediktZ50-70 systemd[1]: Unit apparmor.service entered failed state.
  Apr 05 12:29:33 benediktZ50-70 systemd[1]: apparmor.service failed.

  However Apparmor loaded successfully:

  % sudo aa-status
  apparmor module is loaded.
  17 profiles are loaded.
  17 profiles are in enforce mode.
     /sbin/dhclient
     /usr/lib/NetworkManager/nm-dhcp-client.action
     /usr/lib/NetworkManager/nm-dhcp-helper
     /usr/lib/connman/scripts/dhclient-script
     /usr/lib/cups/backend/cups-pdf
     /usr/lib/libvirt/virt-aa-helper
     /usr/lib/telepathy/mission-control-5
     /usr/lib/telepathy/telepathy-*
     /usr/lib/telepathy/telepathy-*//pxgsettings
     /usr/lib/telepathy/telepathy-*//sanitized_helper
     /usr/lib/telepathy/telepathy-ofono
     /usr/sbin/cups-browsed
     /usr/sbin/cupsd
     /usr/sbin/cupsd//third_party
     /usr/sbin/libvirtd
     /usr/sbin/tcpdump
     docker-default
  0 profiles are in complain mode.
  5 processes have profiles defined.
  5 processes are in enforce mode.
     /sbin/dhclient (11821) 
     /usr/lib/telepathy/mission-control-5 (2008) 
     /usr/sbin/cups-browsed (840) 
     /usr/sbin/cupsd (12783) 
     /usr/sbin/libvirtd (971) 
  0 processes are in complain mode.
  0 processes are unconfined but have a profile defined.

  It is really necessary to set Apparmor as failed if one profile could
  not be loaded?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/akonadi/+bug/1440501/+subscriptions