touch-packages team mailing list archive
-
touch-packages team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #69086
[Bug 1442228] Re: lxc fails to start inside vivid container
** Also affects: init-system-helpers (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: upstart (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: init-system-helpers (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: init-system-helpers (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1442228
Title:
lxc fails to start inside vivid container
Status in init-system-helpers package in Ubuntu:
Triaged
Status in lxc package in Ubuntu:
Triaged
Status in upstart package in Ubuntu:
Triaged
Bug description:
When installing lxc, the lxc.postinst tries to install apparmor profiles.
Inside a vivid container on an upstart-based host, the profile loading
script will test /bin//running-in-container and see that it is in a container
and exit 0. On a systemd host, /bin/running-in-container doesn't work, so
the profile loading script exits with error, failing the postinst.
/bin/running-in-container needs to be generalized to work with
systemd.
Unlike upstart, systemd leaves its environment showing in /proc/1/environ,
so we can in fact simply check for "grep -q container=lxc /proc/1/environ",
which we couldn't do with upstart. However, to keep things more similar
between upstart and systemd, and to handle all cases, it would probably be
best to have a systemd unit starting at boot which does the same thing as
the /etc/init/container-detect.conf does.
Then move /bin/running-in-container from upstart into init-system-
helpers.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/init-system-helpers/+bug/1442228/+subscriptions
References