touch-packages team mailing list archive
-
touch-packages team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #81414
[Bug 1445418] Re: Surfaces are not properly released in CustomWindowManagement.state_change_requests_are_associated_with_correct_surface
This bug was fixed in the package mir - 0.13.1+15.10.20150520-0ubuntu1
---------------
mir (0.13.1+15.10.20150520-0ubuntu1) wily; urgency=medium
[ Cemil Azizoglu ]
* New upstream release 0.13.1 (https://launchpad.net/mir/+milestone/0.13.1)
- ABI summary: No ABI break. Servers and clients do not need rebuilding.
. Mirclient ABI unchanged at 8
. Mircommon ABI unchanged at 4
. Mirplatform ABI unchanged at 7
. Mirserver ABI unchanged at 31
- Bug fixes:
. Can't load app purchase UI without a U1 account (LP: #1450377)
. Crash because uncaught exception in mir::events::add_touch (LP: #1437357)
-- CI Train Bot <ci-train-bot@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Wed, 20 May 2015 21:20:15
+0000
** Changed in: mir (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mir in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1445418
Title:
Surfaces are not properly released in
CustomWindowManagement.state_change_requests_are_associated_with_correct_surface
Status in Mir:
Fix Released
Status in mir package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Bug description:
Memory leak in CustomWindowManagement,
state_change_requests_are_associated_with_correct_surface is causing
CI failures in unrelated tests.
Seen in https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/mir-vivid-
amd64-ci/1537/consoleFull:
7: ==13773== 1,359,533 (14,960 direct, 1,344,573 indirect) bytes in 17 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 127 of 127
7: ==13773== at 0x4C2C100: operator new(unsigned long) (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
7: ==13773== by 0x8E5C24: MirConnection::create_surface(MirSurfaceSpec const&, void (*)(MirSurface*, void*), void*) (mir_connection.cpp:147)
7: ==13773== by 0x8D682F: mir_surface_create (mir_surface_api.cpp:149)
7: ==13773== by 0x8D6A1A: mir_surface_create_sync (mir_surface_api.cpp:133)
7: ==13773== by 0x6D9FC7: (anonymous namespace)::Client::surface_create() const (test_custom_window_management.cpp:77)
...
It's strange that the leak is not consistently detected by valgrind.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mir/+bug/1445418/+subscriptions