touch-packages team mailing list archive

[Bartosz Kosiorek <1411187@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I would vote for change framework.
So when "Snooze" is disabled, then only one (big) button will be displayed with "OK" caption.

Here is the current implementation:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1JvDyhsW17d1-Mz8OY1YMBKwfRI2z9qgyRjbujEsxEMk/edit#slide=id.g36c1a0cdd_010

In which I disabling "Snooze" is highly recommended.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to indicator-datetime in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1411187

Title:
  [clock] Add option to not have snooze

Status in Clock application for Ubuntu devices:
  Triaged
Status in Ubuntu UX bugs:
  Confirmed
Status in indicator-datetime package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Snooze is evil.

  I suggest to add to snooze dropdown menu in the option the voice "No
  snooze" or something like this

  GV - UX Solution
  I've added the option to turn snooze off when editing an alarm, plus I've added an option 'Don't snooze in settings'
  https://docs.google.com/a/canonical.com/presentation/d/1JvDyhsW17d1-Mz8OY1YMBKwfRI2z9qgyRjbujEsxEMk/edit#slide=id.g34303b1ce_2_11

  [UX Comment]
  As it seems unlikely that we will be able to implement snooze on/off & snooze duration for individual alarms, but do have an application-wide setting that allows snooze duration to be set (but not disabled), I'd recommend the options relating to snooze in application settings be changed to the following:

  - No snooze
  - 5 minutes
  - 10 minutes
  - 15 minutes

  This way the list is still short (four options, as it is currently)
  but the options provided are likely to be more useful (current 2
  minute snooze doesn't seem very useful, nor does the difference
  between 4 mins and 5 min snooze periods).

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-clock-app/+bug/1411187/+subscriptions