touch-packages team mailing list archive

[Jamie Young <jamie.young@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

** Description changed:

+ [Updated description]
+ 
  Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization.
  Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI.
  
  --- UX Solution ---
  Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer
+ 
+ –––
+ 
+ Desired solution:
+ 
+ Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be
+ consistent with our disabled states on buttons.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485

Title:
  [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled

Status in Ubuntu UX:
  Fix Committed
Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  [Updated description]

  Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization.
  Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI.

  --- UX Solution ---
  Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer

  –––

  Desired solution:

  Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be
  consistent with our disabled states on buttons.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions