ubuntu-389-directory-server team mailing list archive

[Sergio Durigan Junior <2052578@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks, Chris.

I went ahead and uploaded it to noble-proposed.  A few suggestions the
next time:

- Providing a PPA and the dep8 test results is always welcome.  It
allows the sponsor to really check that the fix works and doesn't
introduce any regressions.

- I adjusted the changelog entry to fully express the path of the new
patch (i.e., "d/p/32bit...").


Also, it would be great if you could submit this patch upstream and/or to Debian.  This way, we can make the package become a sync again in the near future.  WDYT?

Thanks.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
389 Directory Server, which is subscribed to 389-ds-base in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052578

Title:
   2.4.4+dfsg1-1 is FTBFS on armhf in Noble

Status in 389-ds-base package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  build fails with:
  ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldbm/db-bdb/bdb_layer.c: At top level:
  ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldbm/db-bdb/bdb_layer.c:429:26: error: unknown type name ‘off64_t’; did you mean ‘off_t’?
    429 | bdb_seek43_large(int fd, off64_t offset, int whence)
        |                          ^~~~~~~
        |                          off_t

  
  The source properly detects when to define _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE but I think this is an ordering issue of the define and a standard library header include.

  I can recreate this on an armhf machine by including <stdio.h> before
  the LFS define.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/389-ds-base/+bug/2052578/+subscriptions