ubuntu-389-directory-server team mailing list archive

[Chris Peterson <2052578@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Upstream forward: https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/6089

Thanks Nick, I tested your patch in a PPA and it worked. I forwarded it
to Debian, but it looks like they may just remove the package anyways.

My response should appear here shortly: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063434

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1063434
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063434

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
389 Directory Server, which is subscribed to 389-ds-base in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052578

Title:
   2.4.4+dfsg1-1 is FTBFS on armhf in Noble

Status in 389-ds-base package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  build fails with:
  ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldbm/db-bdb/bdb_layer.c: At top level:
  ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldbm/db-bdb/bdb_layer.c:429:26: error: unknown type name ‘off64_t’; did you mean ‘off_t’?
    429 | bdb_seek43_large(int fd, off64_t offset, int whence)
        |                          ^~~~~~~
        |                          off_t

  
  The source properly detects when to define _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE but I think this is an ordering issue of the define and a standard library header include.

  I can recreate this on an armhf machine by including <stdio.h> before
  the LFS define.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/389-ds-base/+bug/2052578/+subscriptions