ubuntu-apps-bugs team mailing list archive

[Olivier Tilloy <olivier.tilloy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I’m marking this bug as invalid, not because it’s not an issue indeed,
but because it will be better addressed as separate issues for specific
websites/webapps.

The issues related to including an "android" token in the default UA
have been discussed extensively already, it’s a tradeoff we agreed to
make, we’re now left with improving the situation for specific use cases
where possible.

@daker: would you mind filing a separate bug for twitter?

** Changed in: webbrowser-app (Ubuntu)
       Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Apps bug tracking, which is subscribed to webbrowser-app in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1328183

Title:
  User-Agent string results in poor UX on web

Status in “webbrowser-app” package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  The User-Agent string for the browser is similar enough to the Android
  browser User-Agent, that it creates a poor experience when browsing
  the web on an Ubuntu phone. An inordinately large number of web sites
  persistently advertise to "install our app" instead of providing the
  best web experience; an app which cannot be installed.

  This is exacerbated by the pervasiveness of webapps on Ubuntu phone,
  which simply embed the mobile web site with webapp-container, and
  still result in seeing such advertisements, despite the fact that the
  "app" on Ubuntu is already installed, and the Android apps being
  advertised are simply not installable.

  Having all the big web sites telling users of Ubuntu that they should
  be using Android instead, is not very good for the user experience at
  all.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webbrowser-app/+bug/1328183/+subscriptions