ubuntu-bengali-manual team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-bengali-manual team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #04126
[Bug 715581] Re: Agenda item description field is too small
23:10 < mhall119> blahdeblah: which is more important for you, vertical space or horizontal?
23:10 < blahdeblah> yes
23:11 < blahdeblah> ;-)
23:11 < mhall119> portrait or landscape?
23:11 < mhall119> can't say 'yes' to that :P
23:15 < blahdeblah> mhall119: Personally, i would prefer more width, because most screens
nowadays are 16:9 or 16:10 aspect ratio, but others might see it
differently. I would say at least 3 times wider and 2 times taller than
it currently is.
23:16 < mhall119> hmmm, that might be too big for most other teams...
23:16 < mhall119> usually they just use a single line for an agenda item
23:16 < mhall119> the description field was really only for short descriptions
23:16 < blahdeblah> Evidently ;-)
23:17 < mhall119> what are you planning on storing in it?
23:17 < blahdeblah> If people are going to take the time to prepare for the meeting by adding
structured agendas, they will probably want to write 3 or 4 sentences
about their item, IMO.
23:18 < mhall119> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AustralianTeam/Meetings sayd "first a half line
subject, followed by a short description as a sub-point of the subject, and
signing it with your wikiname or IRC nick after that"
23:18 < mhall119> 3 or 4 sentences will probably be the max
23:19 < mhall119> we don't need a 6x size increase to contain that
23:20 < mhall119> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AustralianTeam/Meetings/2011February8 would easily
fit
23:21 < mhall119> I think doubling the width and height should be sufficient
** Changed in: loco-directory
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: loco-directory
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Tags added: meetings
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bengali Manual, which is subscribed to loco-directory.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/715581
Title:
Agenda item description field is too small
Status in LoCo Directory:
Confirmed
Bug description:
It needs to be much larger, and support wiki markup, to be a useful
replacement for the Ubuntu wiki.
References