ubuntu-bugcontrol team mailing list archive

[Pedro Villavicencio Garrido <pedro@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hola,

On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 14:19 -0800, Brian Murray wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 01:56:43PM -0800, Brian Murray wrote:
> > I've received our first bug control application since setting up the
> > list and wanted to test out reviewing this person's application via the
> > mailing list.
> > 
> > ----- Forwarded message from Pedro Fragoso <emberez@xxxxxxxxx> -----
> > 
> > Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:06:44 +0000
> > From: Pedro Fragoso <emberez@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: brian@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Bug control application
> > X-Mailer: Evolution 2.21.90 
> > 
> > Hi Brian !
> > Here's my answers for the application:
> > Name: Pedro Fragoso
> > LP: http://launchpad.net/~ember
> > 
> > 1) Yes i promise to always be polite to any user, and yes i signed the
> > Ubuntu Code of Conduct.
> > https://edge.launchpad.net/~ember/+codesofconduct
> > 
> > 2) Yes i have read it, i have no questions about,  but i think
> > Bugs/Assignment is kinda old perhaps a new update would be great.
> > 
> > 3) I've been working with Desktop and Acessibility Team, and some
> > packages i like (irssi, mpd, evolution-rss,)
> > 
> > 4) https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/190756
> 
> With this bug they just marked it as a duplicate without notifying the
> reporter why or how.  I found out what they did via the activity log.
>  
> > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution-rss/+bug/164129
> 
> It looks to me they have confirmed the bug here but it isn't clear to me
> why.  Anyone?

He triaged the bug and prepared a new version for being uploaded, looks
more than good for me.

> 
> > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/irssi/+bug/181641/+activity
> 
> This looks good to me as they fixed the bug.

same as previous one.

> 
> > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sshmenu/+bug/186109
> 
> This looks good to me also.
> 
> > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mpd/+bug/181774
> 
> This looks good too.

Both ok for me too.

> 
> I don't have strong opinions either way about approving or disapproving
> this candidate.  They don't seem to have done much traditional bug
> triaging and seem to be on the path to MOTU.  
> 
> On a more general note, I feel like we need or want triagers in the Bug 
> Control team and that this isn't necessarily people who are becoming 
> MOTUs.  Additionally, keep in mind that the Ubuntu development team is a 
> member of the bug control team so people working on becoming MOTUs will 
> have the same ability to set bug priority as the Bug Control team.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 

The candidate is working pretty good with the desktop team doing
packaging uploads but haven't seen him doing triage there. I'd prefer to
encourage him to join the MOTU team rather since as you said we need
more people focused on triage on the bugcontrol team.

Have a nice day,

pedro.