ubuntu-bugcontrol team mailing list archive

[Jack Leigh <leighmanthegreat@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

>> Would set importance according>> to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/WineTeam/Contributing, setting upstreamed>> bugs to Triaged>> Actually, no, You are expected to set the importance according to> *Ubuntu* rules [1]. Upstream's importance does not really play here> (although, most of the times, Ubuntu and upstream do match).Okay, sorry about that but was directed there by Wine team documentation.  They seem to accord more-or-less anyway.>> But, anyway, you did not indicate what importance you would have set> on any of the bugs below.>>> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.2/+bug/607970>> Thank you for upstreaming this bug. Good work (and I also frankly> doubt if it will be resolved, but who knows).I would mark this as Low since it affects a non-core application and is an unusual request>>> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.2/+bug/614546>> Why did you mark it Fix Released for wine-1.2 (Ubuntu)? Have we> already published the fix on Maverick? I do not think so, since the> fix is on Wine 1.3.1. The actual stati should be:>> Fix Released for the upstream> Triaged for the Ubuntu task.>> A bug is only considered Fix Released on Ubuntu when we publish the> fixed version.Okay, sorry about that -- got a bit confused because I assumed there would be a wine1.3 package in Maverick like in the wine ppa.  Bad assumption!  Thanks for fixing it up.Probably again Low since it affects a minor application.Incidentally the Latin plural of 'status' is 'statūs' (4th declension, masculine), so 'statuses' is probably better! :D>>> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.2/+bug/479223>> -- added link to already filed upstream>> Thank you for the upstream link.Would set this as Low since it's a rare/old application>>> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.2/+bug/601715>> OK. What was triaged here?Sorry, I think that might have been a mistake (although I have requested further information and marked 'Incomplete')Have https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.2/+bug/624386 instead, which I have confirmed and requested be upstreamed, then provided further information on the upstream report and made the upstream link.I would set the importance as Low since it is a rare application that I'm not convinced is necessary/ever going to work on Linux>>> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.2/+bug/502375>> -- duped a number of bugs which display the same symptoms to it,>> requested more information about other sound-related bugs which>> don't seem immediately linked to this>> Ugh! Sound bugs are nasty. It might be worth the time to check with> the sound/pulseaudio experts. The only issue I have here is the fact> that there are three different releases of Ubuntu (and two-ish of Wine)> playing, not counting the sound stack.Here I may set the importance to Medium since it has a much wider impact.Should I just ask someone in #ubuntu-bugs regarding the sound bugs (before duping?)?  I was careful in leaving a number alone for now.Upstream wine aren't very forgiving regarding pulseaudio and wine is due to be moving to openAL so these are in flux a little at the moment, I guess.>> All in all, a nice work, but needs more attention to the triaging> documentation. I still want like to know what would you set as> Importance on these bugs.>> Vote as of now is, then,>> 0.>> Cheers,Thanks for the feedback