ubuntu-bugcontrol team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-bugcontrol team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03120
Re: ubuntu-bugcontrol application: ~rsalveti (with corrections)
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:39 PM, C de-Avillez <hggdh2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 05/17/2011 03:55 PM, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/genext2fs/+bug/583317
>> Closed as Invalid after checking that reported behavior was actually
>> the expected one. Would set the importance as [Low] as there is an
>> easy workaround by running fsck at the generated images.
>
> And... is this workaround documented somewhere?
The bug description already says that a workaround to turn the FS from
rev 0 to rev1 is running "tune2fs -j <image>" and "fsck.ext3 -f
<image>". I know the project mailing list also says that this is a
valid workaround until the feature is implemented, so one improvement
here would be to link the project mailing list pointing this
discussion.
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pybootchartgui/+bug/619026
>> Reported and fixed with proper triage (bug state, patch submission and
>> proper tags). Would set the importance as [Low] as the bug has a
>> moderate impact on a non-core application.
>
> <I am being picky>
> Although this bug shows a nice flow on reporting, analysis &
> resolution, it is your *own* bug. We expect you to triage other
> people's bug, not your own...
> </I am being picky>
True, sorry for that :-)
>> Since I've being involved for more than 1 year now, it's quite hard to
>> list the most important ones, but these bugs should cover most
>> important topics. A longer list can be found by looking for bugs I
>> commented and changed status.
>
> All in all, good work! I am happy to give you a
>
> +1.
Awesome, thanks a lot, for both you and David Tombs!
Cheers,
--
Ricardo Salveti de Araujo
Follow ups
References