ubuntu-bugcontrol team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-bugcontrol team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #04391
application for UbuntuBugControl
> Do you promise to be polite to bug reporters even if they are rude to you
> or Ubuntu?
yes.
> Have you signed the Ubuntu Code of Conduct?
yes.
> Have you read Bugs/Triage, Bugs/Assignment, Bugs/Status and
> Bugs/Importance?
yes.
> Do you have any questions about that documentation?
no.
> What sensitive data should you look for in a private Apport crash report
> bug before making it public? See Bugs/Triage for more information.
coredump; sensitive data in stacktrace (passwords, bank numbers, keys,
usernames, system names, etc).
> Is there a particular package or group of packages that you are interested
> in helping out with?
I'm part of Canonical Support and Technical Services Engineering, so I
see bugs that span all aspects of Ubuntu.
> Please list five or more bug reports which you have triaged and include an
> explanation of your decisions. Please note that these bugs should be
> representative of your very best work and they should demonstrate your
> understanding of the triage process and how to properly handle bugs. For
> all the bugs in the list, please indicate what importance you would give it
> and explain the reasoning. Please use urls in your list of bugs.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/linux/+bug/1479031
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1505564
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemtap/+bug/1547644
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemtap/+bug/1557673
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1486670
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemtap/+bug/1545173
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1547680
all of these are either kernel or systemtap bugs, that impacted either
the stability of the kernel or usability of systemtap.
Follow ups