Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 12:59:45PM -0300, Emilia Torino wrote:
On 3/8/21 11:57, Athos Ribeiro wrote:Hi Emilia, On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 12:05:54PM -0300, Emilia Torino wrote: [snip...]To confirm if the 3 git trees were present in both upstream based rocks we were considering, I locally got them (docker pull ubuntu/cortex && docker image save etc, same for telegraf) and in both cases I see the upstream manifest empty. Is that correct?There was an issue with how we parse URLs from the Go package index page. I proposed fixes for that and I will rebuild those images. I will let you know once the new imags get tagged. Thanks for letting us know about this one.Amazing, thanks!
Telegraf and Cortex have been fixed and now do have the proper manifests under the manifest directory.
From my side, yesterday I updated the email subject for the CVEs notification service as agreed and also added cassandra to the monitored rocks for the USN notification service as requested. But based on your last comment and after inspecting the rock, I see I should remove it since its based on a snap, correct?
Right! Thanks for that, Emilia! Is the snap automatically monitored for CVEs though?
We dont have any specific process for you to notify us about new rocks to be monitored. Ideally whenever we have the rockstore at Canonical, this should not be needed at all. Meanwhile, if you can let us know by email or mm (me and amurray) its more than fine! But it is important to clarify what is based on (ubuntu/upstream/snap) to properly add it to the correct service.[snip...]We also agree prometheus, prometheus-alertmanager and grafana were out of this initial services, as were based on snaps. Is that still correct?I missed this one in my previous reply. Yes, this is still correct. Cassandra is our new OCI which is also included in this group of snap based images. [snip...]
-- Athos Ribeiro
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |