ubuntu-docker-images team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-docker-images team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00176
Re: [RFC/RFA] Loki Dockerfile
On Monday, March 28 2022, Athos Ribeiro wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 09:09:00PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>>I have just finished putting together the first version of the Grafana
>>Loki Dockerfile. It is heavily based on our other snap-based
>>Dockerfiles, specifically the one for Prometheus.
>>
>>I haven't written any documentation/tests for it yet; I intend to start
>>doing that next week. The Loki snap is already available, which means
>>that this Dockerfile should work out of the box.
>>
>>Let me know what you think. Thanks.
>
> Thanks! This LGTM :)
Thanks!
> I do have 2 questions regarding the Dockerfile:
>
>>VOLUME [ "/loki" ]
>>WORKDIR /loki
>
> Why did you decide to run containers from this directory and why should
> this directory be a volume?
Good question. I think this can be considered a leftover from the
prometheus Dockerfile, which I used as a base for this one. Now that I
think more about it, I don't think it makes sense to keep these two
lines in the Dockerfile.
If you're OK with this, I will remove these lines and push the branch to
the official repo.
Thanks,
--
Sergio
GPG key ID: E92F D0B3 6B14 F1F4 D8E0 EB2F 106D A1C8 C3CB BF14
Follow ups
References