ubuntu-hams-devel team mailing list archive

[Stefan Tauner <1912371@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 19 May 2021 06:52:55 -0000
Alex Murray <1912371@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> These failures of the mocked tests have been reported upstream at
> https://github.com/flashrom/flashrom/issues/186 by others but no
> response

Hi there,

I was the flashrom maintainer till a few years ago. While I was using
the github repo+tracker, there is currently ~nobody taking care of that.
A more promising way to reach the right people is to write an email to
flashrom@xxxxxxxxxxxx
-- 
Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
ham developers, which is subscribed to libftdi in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912371

Title:
  [MIR] flashrom + libftdi

Status in flashrom package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in libftdi package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  [Summary]
  Further review will be needed. The Package does not have a test suite that runs as autopkgtest.

  [Availability]
  Currently in universe.

  [Duplication]
  There is no other package in main providing the same functionality.

  [Rationale]
  fwupd depends on libflashrom1 for its flashrom plugin, something that's required to update Coreboot firmware.

  [Security]
  No CVE's, but due to the nature of the package security should review.

  [Quality Assurance]
  Package builds and runs easily

  [Dependencies]
  N/A

  [Standards Compliance]
  Complies with FHS, though the organization of files in the source package could be organized better.

  [Common blockers]
  flashrom does NOT have a test suite that runs at build time.
  flashrom does NOT have a test suite that runs as autopkgtest.

  [Maintenance]
  Actively maintained - https://github.com/flashrom/flashrom
  Packaging - https://salsa.debian.org/myczko-guest/flashrom.git

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashrom/+bug/1912371/+subscriptions