Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
I think "Expansion" is probably something we're not so familiar with as programmers and user interface designers, but will be very useful and eliminate the need for "back" in certain circumstances. http://design.ubuntu.com/apps/building-blocks/expansion
Also, the example shown in http://design.ubuntu.com/apps/building-blocks/page-stack - stage 2 - the app could easily have a "back" symbol to the left of Julia's head, no problem - ie the app could supply an obvious "back" when appropriate.
Also, glad I updated, it's come a long way recently! Now I can't sleep at all, I think I'll watch some Justified :) Till later, Scott. ______________________________ Scott May. scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mobile 0417 195 018 On 12/06/13 22:51, Sam Bull wrote:
On Wed, 2013-06-12 at 13:37 +0100, Lou Greenwood wrote:See the following link for examples of the back button in the core OS. http://design.ubuntu.com/apps/building-blocks/page-stackI've been running the system on my phone for nearly 4 months, I know where the back button is. I also know how often I use the back button, and I don't think it's as often as everybody else thinks it is. The visible by default thing might be good in something like system settings, assuming it uses a design where it enters deeper pages like on other OSs. But, it shouldn't a system-wide thing, just for particular apps where you can expect to use the back button frequently. And, I'm pretty sure this can already be implemented by the apps.
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |