ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive

[Josh Leverette <coder543@xxxxxxxxx>]

I agree. A pluggable architecture (like Android's Intents) would be better
than hard coding.

Sincerely,
Josh
On Jul 18, 2013 12:09 PM, "Rasmus Eneman" <Rasmus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I really like a MIME type only approach for this because that makes apps
pluggable. If you for example have an app called barcode scanner for
scanning
barcodes and a shopping app called price checker that can use barcode
scanner
to scan barcodes to scan a products barcode and see where it's cheapest.

Now a new app releases called qr code scanner that can do the same thing but
I for one reason or another preffer this one over barcode scanner a MIME
type
approach lets me use the app I prefer if qr code scanner implements the
same API.
But with a app name/id/path approch I would have to use barcode scanner if
that's
what price checker were designed for.

Of cource all apps needs to be able to register new MIME types. If you have
multiple
apps that support the same MIME type one popup should appear letting you
choose
which one to use.


2013/7/18 Jamie Strandboge <jamie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> On 07/18/2013 11:14 AM, Michał Sawicz wrote:
> > W dniu 18.07.2013 17:38, Marc Deslauriers pisze:
> >> For the browser, I imagine a URL handler will take care of it, but what
> about
> >> spawning a different application that doesn't necessarily handle URLs
> or MIME types?
> >
> > And for network access I expect some platform API instead.
> >
> > I feel like the only instance where we would indeed allow spawning other
> > apps directly would be if it's bundled in the same package - and handled
> > through upstart as usual, I'd say.
>
> Well, an app may want to spawn a browser rather than implementing a webview
> itself. Marc mentioned the URL handler, but I don't know how this would
> work.
> Marc, can you elaborate?
>
> But for the other cases consider the MyApp click package that ships two
> desktop
> files for myapp and myapp-settings. Upstart works fine for launching
> either of
> these from the Dash. However, if myapp wants to launch myapp-settings from
> within itself, we need to define how that is supposed to happen (the
> specific
> problems are in another mailing list[1]). It can't just use:
>   start application APP_ID=myapp-settings
>
> because we don't have a way to prevent it from doing:
>   start application APP_ID=some-other-app
>
> There are some things we can do with AppArmor, but they don't include the
> executed app being managed by upstart.
>
> [1]https://lists.launchpad.net/ubuntu-appstore-developers/msg00296.html
> --
> Jamie Strandboge                 http://www.ubuntu.com/
>
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> Post to     : ubuntu-phone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>


-- 
Rasmus Eneman

--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to     : ubuntu-phone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp