ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive

[Zisu Andrei <matzipan@xxxxxxxxx>]

>
> Sometimes you need to adapt to the new data coming in and compromise some
> of your pre-conceived notions in order to make a campaign successful


>From what I understand about this campaign, it's more of a "what if"
rathern than a "must succeed".

Zisu Andrei


On 5 August 2013 17:03, Omar B. <estelar57@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >You're missing the point, Canonical expressed they are not planning to
> enter the hardware market. Planning a low end device to raise money for a
> high end device is exactly that.
>
> Offering the same device with a little less features or optimizations
> does't equal entering the hardware market.
>
> Sometimes you need to adapt to the new data coming in and compromise some
> of your pre-conceived notions in order to make a campaign successful. It
> wouldn't be the first time , in fact everyday hundreds of campaigns think
> they have everything laid out "perfectly" and then find out along the way
> some of their flaws / mistakes.
>
> This is Agile at is best.
>
> The worst you can do is use the hardcoded "waterfall method" for a
> crowdfunding campaign.
>
> So if that's the case we can officially forget as of today about this
> campaign since with the current structure and perks is not going to happen.
>
>
Zisu Andrei


On 5 August 2013 17:03, Omar B. <estelar57@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >You're missing the point, Canonical expressed they are not planning to
> enter the hardware market. Planning a low end device to raise money for a
> high end device is exactly that.
>
> Offering the same device with a little less features or optimizations
> does't equal entering the hardware market.
>
> Sometimes you need to adapt to the new data coming in and compromise some
> of your pre-conceived notions in order to make a campaign successful. It
> wouldn't be the first time , in fact everyday hundreds of campaigns think
> they have everything laid out "perfectly" and then find out along the way
> some of their flaws / mistakes.
>
> This is Agile at is best.
>
> The worst you can do is use the hardcoded "waterfall method" for a
> crowdfunding campaign.
>
> So if that's the case we can officially forget as of today about this
> campaign since with the current structure and perks is not going to happen.
>
>