ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-phone team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #04713
Re: camera-app vs. webbrowser-app autopilot dependencies
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Jamie Strandboge <jamie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> On 10/21/2013 05:58 AM, Olivier Tilloy wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Omer Akram <omer.akram@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:omer.akram@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > webbrowser-app-autopilot depends on ubuntu-ui-toolkit-autopilot which
> > provides reusable emulators(helpers) to easily interact with
> different
> > components of the ubuntu-ui-toolkit while writing autopilot tests.
> The
> > dependencies come from there. Many other apps depend
> > on ubuntu-ui-toolkit-autopilot as well.
> >
> >
> > That’s correct. And I should add that most applications’ autopilot tests
> should
> > use the standard emulators provided by the SDK, and thus their -autopilot
> > package should depend on ubuntu-ui-toolkit-autopilot.
> >
> >
> > Some packaging expert will need to look at
> ubuntu-ui-toolkit-autopilot and
> > see if we can do some packaging changes there to reduce the deps.
> >
> >
> > Note that ubuntu-ui-toolkit-autopilot depends on dpkg-dev, which pulls
> in a lot
> > of build dependencies, such as make and perl. This is because the
> emulators rely
> > on dpkg-architecture to locate qmlscene.
> > Maybe there’s a simpler way to achieve this, and we could get rid of the
> > dependency on dpkg-dev?
> >
>
> If dpkg-architecture is the only thing pulling in dpkg-dev, just use this
> instead:
> dpkg --print-architecture
>
What the emulators do to determine where the qmlscene binary is is to
invoke:
dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_MULTIARCH
(see
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-sdk-team/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/trunk/view/head:/tests/autopilot/ubuntuuitoolkit/base.py#L28
).
This is different from what `dpkg --print-architecture` returns.
Follow ups
References