ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-phone team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #04834
Re: Thoughts on inhibiting app suspend via application lifecycle
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Rick Spencer
<rick.spencer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Rasmus Eneman <Rasmus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Having only a set of default services would be very limiting.
>> Even if a "music background service" could take streams to support
>> metronome-like apps, how about Spotify or Grooveshark?
>> They both have a lot of security built in and you can't just take a stream
>> and start playing, you have to talk with their servers,
>> make sure you download the streams in correct speed (too fast and they
>> will think your downloading their music, too slow and
>> the listener will be sad) and have a lot of stuff setup just for them to
>> trust you.
>
> Download service?
>
>>
>>
>> And what about smart alarm clocks that’s monitors your sleep cycle?
>
> Microphone service?
>
>>
>> Or my banks app that shows the amount of money on my account when I shake
>> my phone?
>
> Not certain why this would ever happen in the background, but there should
> be a sensor service, right?
>
> I understand what you are saying, but I still don't think we should give up
> so easily. Constraints are good, and lead to a lot of creativity and good
> design. I think we should stay confident in our initial design and not stray
> from the path until we are very certain that it won't work.
>
+1. The real challenge is analyzing potential use-cases, _clearly_
identifying the underlying problems that need to be solved and
offering a solution by means of adopting/offering a service.
The benefit of sticking with a strict policy for resource-constrained
devices is predictable and great performance & battery life, no matter
what set of apps are installed and running.
Thanks,
Thomas
> Cheers, Rick
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> Post to : ubuntu-phone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
References
-
Thoughts on inhibiting app suspend via application lifecycle
From: Jamie Strandboge, 2013-10-21
-
Re: Thoughts on inhibiting app suspend via application lifecycle
From: John Lea, 2013-10-22
-
Re: Thoughts on inhibiting app suspend via application lifecycle
From: Thomas Voß, 2013-10-22
-
Re: Thoughts on inhibiting app suspend via application lifecycle
From: Jamie Strandboge, 2013-10-22
-
Re: Thoughts on inhibiting app suspend via application lifecycle
From: Rasmus Eneman, 2013-10-22
-
Re: Thoughts on inhibiting app suspend via application lifecycle
From: Thomas Voß, 2013-10-23
-
Re: Thoughts on inhibiting app suspend via application lifecycle
From: Andy Doan, 2013-10-23
-
Re: Thoughts on inhibiting app suspend via application lifecycle
From: Michał Sawicz, 2013-10-23
-
Re: Thoughts on inhibiting app suspend via application lifecycle
From: Jo-Erlend Schinstad, 2013-10-23
-
Re: Thoughts on inhibiting app suspend via application lifecycle
From: Rick Spencer, 2013-10-24
-
Re: Thoughts on inhibiting app suspend via application lifecycle
From: Jamie Strandboge, 2013-10-24
-
Re: Thoughts on inhibiting app suspend via application lifecycle
From: Rick Spencer, 2013-10-24
-
Re: Thoughts on inhibiting app suspend via application lifecycle
From: Rasmus Eneman, 2013-10-24
-
Re: Thoughts on inhibiting app suspend via application lifecycle
From: Rick Spencer, 2013-10-24