ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive

[Colin Watson <cjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 09:10:02AM -0500, Pat McGowan wrote:
> Note that the developer should be able to claim support for multiple
> frameworks.
> 
> We had decided to revision frameworks separately for Qt/QML and HTML, so
> should we go ahead with that now rather than use a "sdk" named revision?

Jamie's item 7 is a prerequisite for that, and it'll take a little while
(weeks, not months).  We need to move on with this, so I think we should
probably go ahead with the monolithic sdk framework to unblock people,
and consider subdividing later.

(decoupling for the win)

-- 
Colin Watson                                       [cjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx]