ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive

[Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak <lukasz.zemczak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I wonder then why the silo was marked as 'Tested: Yes' if the basic
testplan wasn't completed? It was also my fault for letting it through
and I'm really pissed about that. Apologies here.

Manuel - could you add a landing for this branch? I'll take care of it,
test it and release it during the weekend ASAP.

On 01.03.2014 17:47, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Manuel de la Pena
> <manuel.delapena@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Manuel de la Pena
>> <manuel.delapena@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Alan Pope <alan.pope@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Image #213 (and subsequent image #214) have a broken
>>>> ubuntu-download-manager). This will prevent (amongst other things)
>>>> being able to install packages from the store. Bug filed:-
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-download-manager/+bug/1286553
>>>>
>>>> If you have already upgraded, you can roll back using:-
>>>>
>>>> ubuntu-device-flash --channel=trusty-proposed --revision=212
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>>
>>> Reading the logs is not that udm is not downloading the file correctly and
>>> they are in disk, the issues is related to the fact that the click command
>>> is not finding the file (probably the temp file was not renamed on time),
>>> I'm surprise this landed taking into account that I clearly specified that
>>> the click scop MOST always be tested when landing udm as per
>>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlan/ubuntu-download-manager
>>>
>>> Anyway, I'm fixing it before monday.
>>>
>>
>> To be clear, I'm not blaming anyone.. but please when we land thins things
>> in the CI train people should follow the testing plan, specially when I, for
> 
> 
> The CI Train process is new, so mistakes are made and we expected such
> things to happen. Good news is that the testplan we have for these
> components would have caught this issue during the landing process, so
> it's just getting the process fully established.
> 
>> example, do not have a device and testing all udm paths on the emulator atm
>> is not feasible :-(
> 
> 
>>
>> PS: Who ever has a nexus 4 not used, please take my money, I'll be more that
>> happy to pay for one and do also QA before the silo lands.
> 
> One should be en-route to you very soon and thanks for the quick fix!
> 
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Manuel
>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Alan Pope
>>>> Engineering Manager
>>>>
>>>> Canonical - Product Strategy
>>>> +44 (0) 7973 620 164
>>>> alan.pope@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> http://ubuntu.com/
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
>>>> Post to     : ubuntu-phone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
>>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
>> Post to     : ubuntu-phone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
> 


-- 
Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak
 lukasz.zemczak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 www.canonical.com