ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive

[Manuel de la Pena <manuel.delapena@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 1 Mar 2014 18:54, "Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak" <
lukasz.zemczak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I wonder then why the silo was marked as 'Tested: Yes' if the basic
> testplan wasn't completed? It was also my fault for letting it through
> and I'm really pissed about that. Apologies here.

No big deal, we can fix it quickly.
>
> Manuel - could you add a landing for this branch? I'll take care of it,
> test it and release it during the weekend ASAP.

I have added the MR but I have no rights to edit the spreadsheet for the
landing :-/

Roberto can you do that for us?

>
> On 01.03.2014 17:47, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Manuel de la Pena
> > <manuel.delapena@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Manuel de la Pena
> >> <manuel.delapena@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Alan Pope <alan.pope@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> Image #213 (and subsequent image #214) have a broken
> >>>> ubuntu-download-manager). This will prevent (amongst other things)
> >>>> being able to install packages from the store. Bug filed:-
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-download-manager/+bug/1286553
> >>>>
> >>>> If you have already upgraded, you can roll back using:-
> >>>>
> >>>> ubuntu-device-flash --channel=trusty-proposed --revision=212
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Reading the logs is not that udm is not downloading the file
correctly and
> >>> they are in disk, the issues is related to the fact that the click
command
> >>> is not finding the file (probably the temp file was not renamed on
time),
> >>> I'm surprise this landed taking into account that I clearly specified
that
> >>> the click scop MOST always be tested when landing udm as per
> >>>
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlan/ubuntu-download-manager
> >>>
> >>> Anyway, I'm fixing it before monday.
> >>>
> >>
> >> To be clear, I'm not blaming anyone.. but please when we land thins
things
> >> in the CI train people should follow the testing plan, specially when
I, for
> >
> >
> > The CI Train process is new, so mistakes are made and we expected such
> > things to happen. Good news is that the testplan we have for these
> > components would have caught this issue during the landing process, so
> > it's just getting the process fully established.
> >
> >> example, do not have a device and testing all udm paths on the
emulator atm
> >> is not feasible :-(
> >
> >
> >>
> >> PS: Who ever has a nexus 4 not used, please take my money, I'll be
more that
> >> happy to pay for one and do also QA before the silo lands.
> >
> > One should be en-route to you very soon and thanks for the quick fix!
> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Manuel
> >>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Alan Pope
> >>>> Engineering Manager
> >>>>
> >>>> Canonical - Product Strategy
> >>>> +44 (0) 7973 620 164
> >>>> alan.pope@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> http://ubuntu.com/
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> >>>> Post to     : ubuntu-phone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> >>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> >> Post to     : ubuntu-phone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> >> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak
>  lukasz.zemczak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  www.canonical.com
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> Post to     : ubuntu-phone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp