ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive

[Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak <lukasz.zemczak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi everyone,

So, I went in and did a priority landing of the fix. Alan helped me out
testing the whole test plan and we decided to land it. Reverting was a
bad idea since the silo had a few different components in it, so it was
more straightforward this way. Hopefully the next image will be fine.

It was also a mistake on my side, again assumptions assumptions - but no
use finding excuses. I apologize for my part and I promise this will not
happen again.

Anyway, thanks Manuel and Alan! :)

On 01.03.2014 19:49, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Mar 01, 2014, at 03:35 PM, Roberto Alsina wrote:
> 
>> There was also a lack of thorough verification on my side as one of the
>> landers: I asked "did you guys check this" because I could not. I did not
>> ask "did you guys follow the whole test plan?"
>>
>> So, a learning opportunity all around :-(
> 
> Several of us also had good discussions yesterday about getting the whole
> stack QA and automatically tested.  That's a huge step toward ensuring no
> regressions.  Let's make sure that click updates are also on that plan.
> 
> -Barry
> 
> 
> 

Best regards,

-- 
Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak
 lukasz.zemczak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 www.canonical.com