ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive

[Manuel de la Pena <manuel.delapena@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 1 Mar 2014 20:54, "Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak" <
lukasz.zemczak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> So, I went in and did a priority landing of the fix. Alan helped me out
> testing the whole test plan and we decided to land it. Reverting was a
> bad idea since the silo had a few different components in it, so it was
> more straightforward this way. Hopefully the next image will be fine.
>
> It was also a mistake on my side, again assumptions assumptions - but no
> use finding excuses. I apologize for my part and I promise this will not
> happen again.
>

Superb!!!
> Anyway, thanks Manuel and Alan! :)

Thank you!! Lets get back to our weekend :)

>
> On 01.03.2014 19:49, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> > On Mar 01, 2014, at 03:35 PM, Roberto Alsina wrote:
> >
> >> There was also a lack of thorough verification on my side as one of the
> >> landers: I asked "did you guys check this" because I could not. I did
not
> >> ask "did you guys follow the whole test plan?"
> >>
> >> So, a learning opportunity all around :-(
> >
> > Several of us also had good discussions yesterday about getting the
whole
> > stack QA and automatically tested.  That's a huge step toward ensuring
no
> > regressions.  Let's make sure that click updates are also on that plan.
> >
> > -Barry
> >
> >
> >
>
> Best regards,
>
> --
> Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak
>  lukasz.zemczak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  www.canonical.com
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> Post to     : ubuntu-phone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp