ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-phone team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #07128
Re: Landing team meeting 19.03.14
On Mar 21, 2014 4:13 AM, "Colin Watson" <cjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 09:45:14PM -0500, Victor Thompson wrote:
> > Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Given the choice, which is better: to have slightly more frequent
> > > breakage, but have key engineers be fresh and able to work on urgent
> > > problems that come their way every so often; or to have our key
> > > engineers concentrate hard every day to make sure as few regressions
as
> > > possible slip in, at the cost that when difficult problems show up
> > > they're too tired and demotivated to deal with them properly? I'm
> > > worried that risk aversion means we tend to aim for the latter.
> >
> > Frequent breakages that get put on a "list" while the project moves
> > forward is exactly why the Terminal app had the backspace/enter
> > regression for months.
>
> I didn't say that bugs like that should be put on the shelf and ignored.
> What I said was that management should absolutely be making sure that
> the right people are working on that sort of thing, but without blocking
> dozens of other engineers until it's done.
>
> The probability of changes to the base system interfering in any
> significant way with somebody's ability to sort out a core-app-level bug
> like this is negligible.
>
> > There are two paths to take right now for the music app bug:
> > 1. Wait for the upstream QtMultimedia bug to be fixed [1]
> > 2. Move aggressively towards the Media Hub component with playlist
support
> >
> > Given that the project's need to push features to the QA supported
> > channel (I'm not convinced that most dogfooders are on the
> > non-proposed channel anyway), I suggest we avoid the upstream battle
> > and move towards integrating the Media Hub as quickly as possible.
>
> I hope you're not suggesting that we stop the line until media-hub is
> ready. I've got no problem with the media-hub direction (indeed I
> approved its feature freeze exception bug 1290360 recently); but from
> the landing point of view it is a significant and large new chunk of
> work. It could easily take some time to stabilise in its own right.
I'm only suggesting direction to resolve the situation at hand. I have no
desire to hold the platform hostige in the meantime.
Victor
> --
> Colin Watson [cjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx]
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> Post to : ubuntu-phone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
References
-
Re: Landing team meeting 19.03.14
From: Jean-Baptiste Lallement, 2014-03-20
-
Re: Landing team meeting 19.03.14
From: Jamie Strandboge, 2014-03-20
-
Re: Landing team meeting 19.03.14
From: Rick Spencer, 2014-03-20
-
Re: Landing team meeting 19.03.14
From: Paul Larson, 2014-03-20
-
Re: Landing team meeting 19.03.14
From: Leo Arias, 2014-03-20
-
Re: Landing team meeting 19.03.14
From: Bill Filler, 2014-03-20
-
Re: Landing team meeting 19.03.14
From: Sebastien Bacher, 2014-03-20
-
Re: Landing team meeting 19.03.14
From: Gustavo Boiko, 2014-03-20
-
Re: Landing team meeting 19.03.14
From: Colin Watson, 2014-03-21
-
Re: Landing team meeting 19.03.14
From: Victor Thompson, 2014-03-21
-
Re: Landing team meeting 19.03.14
From: Colin Watson, 2014-03-21