ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-phone team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #07295
Re: [Design] New back button placement, are we serious ?!?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 03/26/2014 06:58 AM, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> hi, Am Mittwoch, den 26.03.2014, 02:57 -0700 schrieb Nathan Haines:
>> On 03/26/2014 02:46 AM, Michael Zanetti wrote:
>>> Note aside: The reason why the Launcher on the phone is inverted, is because it was too hard to reach the home
>>> button in the top left corner.
>>
>> Which I'd assumed. A bit of a shame as far as interface conventions go, but on the other hand I can count with
>> no hands the number of times I've ever needed to use it. :)
>>
> hmm, same here, I used it once to try out what happens though :) Might be interesting to head if there was any user
> testing done if it is used much at all ... one could possibly replace it with a back button if it is actually used
> rarely ;)
How else do you find a launch applications? I already find it hard, what with having to open the Launcher, hit the
Unity button and get a random screen, repeat until eventually I get the Home screen, then swipe left to get the
application screen and swipe up past the running apps (although sometimes that gesture switches back to the Home
screen) to find the installed apps, then choose one to launch. Once it's running I can lock it to the launcher
(assuming I hold the phone right and use a finger, not my thumb).
Perhaps there's another way, but I just haven't discovered it yet. I've only had the phone for a few weeks. Other
phones and tablets I have used have a button I can press to get back to a home screen. I think it would be a bad
design to never be able to get to a safe known location from anywhere.
- --
Stephen M. Webb <stephen.webb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=sI1f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Follow ups
References
-
[Design] New back button placement, are we serious ?!?
From: Oliver Grawert, 2014-03-25
-
Re: [Design] New back button placement, are we serious ?!?
From: Alberto Mardegan, 2014-03-25
-
Re: [Design] New back button placement, are we serious ?!?
From: Martin Pitt, 2014-03-26
-
Re: [Design] New back button placement, are we serious ?!?
From: Michael Zanetti, 2014-03-26
-
Re: [Design] New back button placement, are we serious ?!?
From: Nathan Haines, 2014-03-26
-
Re: [Design] New back button placement, are we serious ?!?
From: Oliver Grawert, 2014-03-26