ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive

[Paul Larson <paul.larson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Didier Roche
<didier.roche@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2 images since yesterday, finally one where we will get full test results
> hopefully! (first time since Friday, let's hope everything will be fine :))
>
> #270 from yesterday didn't get full tests results due to infrastructure
> issues.
>
> #271:
> - new unity-scopes
> - now adb shell will give you right local and encoding
> - some apparmor profile change for the incoming oxide
> - drop unity-core based scopes in scopes plugins
>
> The last change dropped libunity-core from the image, which, has a
> consequences, remove a schema file from Unity7 that Unity8 needed. That's
> the reason why this image wasn't booting (and so, we don't get test results
> either).
>
> #272:
> - an unity8 version pulling libunity-core back in the image (then, we need
> to discuss on unity8 not depending on unity7 keys, still providing a
> migration path)
> - new camera-app
>
> -> the tests are still running for that one. Unity8 is coming after a boot
> and we do hope we'll finally get some test results (we can confirm that we
> still have unity8 crashers since the new scope switch still).

http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/trusty/touch/mako/272:20140401.1:20140331/7506/
looked really good with the exception of the click-image-test. That
was an easy fix in the testcase itself and a merge has already been
checked in for it, so next image it should pass.

Otherwise, the only unity crash we saw in this image was in the unity
test run itself:
http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/trusty/touch/mako/272:20140401.1:20140331/7506/unity8/

Another thing I worked on today as a result of the problems we had
with 270, is a way that we can easily run past images and have it
update the dashboard results as it normally would, even if other
images have come in since.  This can be specified both on the command
line scripts, as well as a parameter in the jenkins job itself.  My
understanding from our call today was that if everything looked good
in 272 then you weren't so interested in the back-results from 270. If
you do still want them though, aside from the ones I ran locally and
told you about, let me know and I'll be happy to try out this new
feature on that.

Thanks!
Paul Larson