ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-phone team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #07583
Re: Landing team 08.04.14
On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 03:08 -0300, Ricardo Salveti de Araujo wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Oliver Grawert <ogra@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > hi,
> > Am Dienstag, den 08.04.2014, 18:26 +0200 schrieb Didier Roche:
> >
> >> ** When using multiple webapps they crash randomly, if there is only
> >> one app remaining, this one starts being replaced when new ones start
> >> (Kevin)
> >> https://launchpad.net/bugs/1303676
> >> -> it has been retargeted to unity-mir
> >
> > definitely not (only) a unity-mir issue and most likely two bugs (like
> > we just discussed in the meeting) ...
> > 1) the webapp-container starts apps twice (or re-execs them) ...
> > 2) the containers hit OOM at some point (apart from the fact they
> > shouldnt OOM just randomly, only the initializing process gets killed
> > and the subsequent forks (and their oxide processes) keep running)
>
> We have another problem that we're not properly setting the oom score
> in our lifecycle, as currently the system services all have minor
> priority when comparing to user session jobs (and apps).
>
> So in case the low-memory-killer kicks in, you might have weird
> behaviors as it might be killing random system services.
I didn't put a default oom score in for apps because I thought unity-mir
was setting it right away anyway. Should we put a default value in?
Something like 500 just to ensure that backgrounded apps get hit first,
but keep it away from system services.
Ted
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
References