ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive

[Yasmany Cubela Medina <yasmanycm@xxxxxxxxx>]

I support the idea of DIGITAL-FREEDOM and the final user have the real
control over the device (software/hardware), but what its the point of
having an anti-theft software that any user can disable or uninstall at any
moment?

I talk for my self. in the past month i lost my Nexus5 at the hands of a
thief and i have installed Goolge Device Manager and Avast anti-theft on
that device, but even with that i can find or protect my device. The only
thin the theif or new user need to do its just its just re-flash a new rom
and that is a new phone.

Maybe i dont explain the main idea. What i suggest its a sort of first-time
registration process, where only the owner can access this kind of settings
or why not uninstall or disable this piece of code if that its his choice,
but if it let it enabled it will be a final solution, because if the thief
or new user try to restart the OS need to pass over this first-time
registration process and the phone will be useless if the first owner wont
gave access to it.

Again i love the idea of me (the main owner of my phone) have access to all
of it and do with it what i want, test, enable, disable, develop, but with
the certain that even then my phone will be protected in the cloud with
this idea.

Thanks all of you for share and discuss this idea

 S.U.C.C.E.S.S
Success is a journey, not a destination.

 Ing. Yasmany Cubela Medina:
Linux user 446757
Ubuntu user 13464


On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:11 PM, David Marceau
<uticdmarceau2007@xxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Ubuntu-Phone and any other GNU/Linux phone should be all about
> digital-freedoms, NOT digital-constraints.  The Ubuntu Phone will be
> about YOU, about do-it-yourself(DIY).  Purist DIGITAL-FREEDOM hardware
> buyers WILL BUY a phone where you can install/change whatever you want
> whenever you want.
>
> It's ok to install anti-theft software, but the idea of having some
> hardware/software within the infrastructure where the user has no
> control over it, does not sit well with me.  That is not the kind of
> phone that I want.
>
> Purist DIGITAL-FREEDOM hardware buyers WON'T ACCEPT and WON'T BUY a
> phone where you can change some of phone stuff, some of the time, except
> for this-and-that phone-feature which you can never touch.
>
> Thank you for listening.
>
> On 04/23/2014 11:33 AM, Daniel Holm wrote:
> > I've started developing what I'd like to became this kind of app. As soon
> > as I got some more code in there I'll push it to a launchpad project and
> > I'd be happy if more people would join in.
> >
> > I also think we need some help from the core devs since this app has to
> > have some kind of running background service and should not be able to be
> > easily installed, as previously stated.
> >
> > Vänlig hälsning / Yours sincerely,
> >    Daniel Holm
> >    IT Consultant
> >    Web Developer
> >    Student, Political Science
> >    d.holmen@xxxxxxxxx
> >    http://www.danielholm.se
> > Den 23 apr 2014 09:29 skrev "Jodie Robinson" <
> jodiematthewrobinson@xxxxxxxxx
> >> :
> >
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> Sorry I'm a bit late for the party.
> >>
> >> I agree that it would be nice to have some sort of optional tracking
> >> system installed to the phone by default.
> >> I would say that the backend service should be open source so
> >> one/businesses could create their own Roms to connect to their own
> servers.
> >>
> >> What I'd prefer to blocking the device is to be able to track it and
> maybe
> >> take screenshots/photos like Prey can, even after one erases the phone.
> >> maybe a remote wipe is also a good idea. This would be a backdoor, but
> it
> >> would be able to track a device without a thief knowing anything about
> it
> >> (save for data usage).
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Jodie
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> Post to     : ubuntu-phone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>