ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive

[Martin Pitt <martin.pitt@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Steve Langasek [2014-06-13 14:33 -0700]:
> This leaves Ubuntu devs with an unpleasant choice: do they slow down their
> work in order to push all changes through the regular CI process,
> eliminating the risk of regression from a no-change rebuild?  Or do they get
> the changes done in the archive efficiently, so that they don't have to
> spend half a day (or more) handholding the change through the system?

I'd also be perfectly happy to just push to lp:project, but as these
aren't really trunks but really just a read-only reflection of what's
in the distro, I was told that this wouldn't work either.

Would it work to push to lp:project *and* upload? Would the CI train
consider this as a consistent change?

Martin

-- 
Martin Pitt                        | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature