ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-phone team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #09568
Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Landing team - RTM landings now officially open!
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak
<lukasz.zemczak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> As we have now officially branched for ubuntu-rtm, we would also like to
> announce that landing for RTM-targetted images is now officially open!
> This means that all landers can have their changes landed into
> ubuntu-rtm when they want it. We have enabled some features in the CI
> Train for this purpose last week, but only now the test run is over and
> everything that lands will stay in the archive.
>
> By default from now on anything that's landed in ubuntu will not be part
> of the RTM-targeted images. So make sure you get the changes you want to
> ubuntu-rtm.
> Please read on to get to know the process itself.
>
>
> * How to land a package to ubuntu-rtm?
>
> First of all, you will need to have a separate branch for your RTM
> backports. The naming and location of this branch is all up to you. Some
> of the projects that participated in the testing landings last week used
> the naming scheme of lp:projectname/rtm-14.09 .
> Before releasing anything for ubuntu-rtm, make sure the same change is
> already released in Ubuntu current development series (e.g. utopic). We
> only accept cherry-picked changes from trunks. In other words: if
> something is to land in RTM it will require a double landing - one to
> ubuntu, then to ubuntu-rtm. Once that happens, fill in a landing with
> the new merge requests to the RTM branches in our CI Train spreadsheet
> and set the Target Distribution field to "ubuntu-rtm/14.09". The rest is
> the same as before, with the change being that the landing needs to be
> tested against ubuntu-rtm built images instead. Remember to double check
> that your RTM merges are targeting the right branches - i.e. the RTM
> branch created earlier.
>
> To summarize, the general process:
> - Making sure an RTM branch (for this example let's use
> lp:foo/rtm-14.09) exists and corresponds to what is in ubuntu-rtm
> - Creating a merge request of a feature/fix to ubuntu (target -> lp:foo)
> - Driving a landing through CI Train of this merge/merges to ubuntu
> (target distribution -> ubuntu/utopic)
> - Creating a branch with the same changes but based on lp:foo/rtm-14.09
> - Creating a merge request of the feature/fix to ubuntu-rtm (target ->
> lp:foo/rtm-14.09)
> - Driving a landing through CI Train of this merge/merges to ubuntu-rtm
> (target distribution -> ubuntu-rtm/14.09)
> - Change, after possible additional testing, lands in RTM
>
> Currently ubuntu-rtm landings are also treated very safely, so most
> landings might require a QA sign-off before those can be published into
> the archive.
For the landing that are RTM only anyway, I don't see why we'd need to
create a RTM branch. That would only make sense in case the upstream
wants to deliver new features that are not necessarily related to RTM
(so we can just cherry-pick stuff to RTM).
Also, why can't we just do a package sync between both distros?
ubuntu-rtm is a derived distro anyway.
It seems overly complicated, really.
Cheers,
--
Ricardo Salveti de Araujo
Follow ups
References