← Back to team overview

ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive

Re: [Performance] process message+

 

Hi.

following up on this...

it did not happen for a while, but it happened today again. (see
original message)
dbus was spinning up, so it was almost impossible to use the phone.

i was able to record some traffic going over the bus with dbus-monitor.
the high performance impact is wifi related. network discovery or
something...?

this pastebin shows the log with high performance impact.
at the end of the log you can see things getting normal again:
http://pastebin.com/v55umuBF

this pastebin in comparison shows the traffic after things settled and
the phone was usable again.
http://pastebin.com/CrQ0Z3K2


even if the system is busy discovering accesspoints it whould not freeze
like this.
hope this is helpful in some way to solve this...


best
ingo



Am 02/07/15 um 16:29 schrieb Ted Gould:
>
> DBus daemon is just a bus, so it only uses CPU when someone asks it
> to. It's likely that someone is misbehaving on the bus more than
> anything. You can call dbus-monitor to get a dump of what is happening
> on the bus at that time and that would probably give more information
> to be able to debug it.
>
> Ted
>
> On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 15:28 +0200, Ingo Randolf wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> My bad.
>> It is not process "message+" it is user message+ running:
>> dbus-daemon
>>
>> so dbus-daemon spins up often...
>>
>>
>> another process using up quite a lot cpu is:
>> coperegistry
>>
>>
>> anything i can do about this?
>>
>> thanks
>> ingo
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 02/07/15 um 14:42 schrieb Ingo Randolf:
>> > Hello.
>> >
>> > I use a bq-phone with ubuntu-touch with the latest update.
>> > OS build number: 23
>> > 20150611.3
>> >
>> >
>> > the phone freezes regularely, often it reacts very (very) slowly.
>> >
>> > if i then check the running processes i see the process "message+"
>> using
>> > over 90% cpu.
>> > sometimes process+ takes up more than 96% of cpu time.
>> >
>> > what is message+?
>> > why does it use so much processing power?
>> > can i do something to reduce its need for cpu time?
>> >
>> > thanks
>> > greetings
>> > ingo
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>
>


Follow ups

References