ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive

[Christian Dywan <christian.dywan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hey Brendan,

Indeed that would explain it. Is there a bug tracking this?

Am Fr, 18. Sep, 2015 um 12:36 schrieb Brendan Donegan 
<brendan.donegan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi Christian,
>
> The citrain tool still does not do an autoremove after upgrading, so 
> the qtubuntu-sensors package was not removed when installing the silo
>
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 at 11:34 Christian Dywan 
> <christian.dywan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Even more fun would be to ask: how is this possible? Why didn't any 
> > sort of testing catch this?
> >
> > Am Fr, 18. Sep, 2015 um 11:08 schrieb Oliver Grawert 
> > <ogra@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> > > hi,
> > >
> > > Am Freitag, den 18.09.2015, 09:19 +0200 schrieb royden yates:
> > > >  Hi,
> > > >
> > > >  rc-proposed on MX4 latest.  I notice that qtubuntu-sensors:armhf 
> > > > got
> > > >  dropped.  Now I do not have an accelerometer in "SensorsStatus".
> > > >  Co-incidence?
> > >
> > > the bit of the framework that pulled it in via a dependency dropped 
> > > that
> > > dependency.... the qtubuntu-sensors package is now being added 
> > > directly
> > > to the seeds and an image is re-spun.
> > >
> > > that's the fun of using rc-proposed ;)
> > >
> > > ciao
> > > 	oli
> > > --
> > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> > > Post to     : ubuntu-phone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> > > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> > --
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> > Post to     : ubuntu-phone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp