ubuntu-sdk-bugs team mailing list archive

[Timo Jyrinki <timo.jyrinki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

** Also affects: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu RTM)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Also affects: canonical-devices-system-image
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image
     Assignee: (unassigned) => Zoltan Balogh (bzoltan)

** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image
    Milestone: None => 11

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
SDK bug tracking, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485

Title:
  [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled

Status in Canonical System Image:
  New
Status in Ubuntu UX:
  Fix Committed
Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu RTM:
  New

Bug description:
  [Updated description]

  Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization.
  Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI.

  --- UX Solution ---
  Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer

  –––

  Desired solution:

  Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be
  consistent with our disabled states on buttons.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions