ubuntu-sdk-bugs team mailing list archive

[Timo Jyrinki <1586026@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

** Description changed:

  Summary of archive operations:
  
  On yakkety, remove arm64 binaries from the following source packages:
- bino sdrangelove tulip vite
+ bino goldencheetah sdrangelove tulip vite
  
- todo: cross-check list of packages where armhf build is omitted on purpose instead of ftbfs?
- todo2: See https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/goldencheetah/3.3.0-3build1/+build/9805094 - however qwtplot3d did/would rebuild on arm64. Would the successful rebuild of qwtplot3d help rebuilding goldencheetah on arm64?
+ candidates: openscad ovito yade
  
  ---
  
  Qt build for arm64 recently switched to using OpenGL ES in yakkety,
  similar to armhf.
  
  Currently I've gotten output of packages building against Qt 5
  (qtbase5-dev, qt5-qmake, qtdeclarative5-dev or qt5-default), and a list
  of packages failing to build on armhf (even if failing on other
  architectures) from http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/.
  
  Combining those results in this list:
  itksnap
  klog
  libqglviewer
  mudlet
  sdrangelove
  sleepyhead
  thumbnailer
  tulip
  
  Of which I already knew tulip was affected. klog and thumbnailer seem
  false positive, making the following candidates of removing arm64
  binaries of:
  
  itksnap
  libqglviewer
  mudlet
  sdrangelove
  sleepyhead
  tulip
  
  Update: To get absolutely everything, I got a list of all binaries
  depending on libqt5core5a, got the source package for them and cross-
  checked. This got me the list of the six above plus the following three:
  
  bino
  qwtplot3d
  vite
  
  However, rebuilding all of the nine resulted in discovery that not all
  that failed on armhf fail on arm64: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-
  service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-035/+packages
  
  The failures for 5 armhf packages seem to be not related to the choice
  of Qt's OpenGL configuration options, so the arm64 builds succeeded (in
  case of itksnap, would have succeeded if not for other FTBFS problem).
+ 
+ --
+ Same but for depwait and not ftbfs:
+ 
+ goldencheetah
+ openscad
+ ovito
+ qtconnectivity-opensource-src
+ yade

** Also affects: bino (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Description changed:

  Summary of archive operations:
  
- On yakkety, remove arm64 binaries from the following source packages:
+ On yakkety, remove arm64 binaries from the following source packages that would now fail the arm64 build if rebuilt:
  bino goldencheetah sdrangelove tulip vite
  
  candidates: openscad ovito yade
  
  ---
  
  Qt build for arm64 recently switched to using OpenGL ES in yakkety,
  similar to armhf.
  
  Currently I've gotten output of packages building against Qt 5
  (qtbase5-dev, qt5-qmake, qtdeclarative5-dev or qt5-default), and a list
  of packages failing to build on armhf (even if failing on other
  architectures) from http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/.
  
  Combining those results in this list:
  itksnap
  klog
  libqglviewer
  mudlet
  sdrangelove
  sleepyhead
  thumbnailer
  tulip
  
  Of which I already knew tulip was affected. klog and thumbnailer seem
  false positive, making the following candidates of removing arm64
  binaries of:
  
  itksnap
  libqglviewer
  mudlet
  sdrangelove
  sleepyhead
  tulip
  
  Update: To get absolutely everything, I got a list of all binaries
  depending on libqt5core5a, got the source package for them and cross-
  checked. This got me the list of the six above plus the following three:
  
  bino
  qwtplot3d
  vite
  
  However, rebuilding all of the nine resulted in discovery that not all
  that failed on armhf fail on arm64: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-
  service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-035/+packages
  
  The failures for 5 armhf packages seem to be not related to the choice
  of Qt's OpenGL configuration options, so the arm64 builds succeeded (in
  case of itksnap, would have succeeded if not for other FTBFS problem).
  
  --
  Same but for depwait and not ftbfs:
  
  goldencheetah
  openscad
  ovito
  qtconnectivity-opensource-src
  yade

** Also affects: goldencheetah (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Also affects: sdrangelove (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Also affects: tulip (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Also affects: vite (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** No longer affects: qtbase-opensource-src (Ubuntu)

** Description changed:

  Summary of archive operations:
  
  On yakkety, remove arm64 binaries from the following source packages that would now fail the arm64 build if rebuilt:
  bino goldencheetah sdrangelove tulip vite
  
  candidates: openscad ovito yade
  
- ---
+ --- below is background regarding how the package list was created
  
  Qt build for arm64 recently switched to using OpenGL ES in yakkety,
  similar to armhf.
  
  Currently I've gotten output of packages building against Qt 5
  (qtbase5-dev, qt5-qmake, qtdeclarative5-dev or qt5-default), and a list
  of packages failing to build on armhf (even if failing on other
  architectures) from http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/.
  
  Combining those results in this list:
  itksnap
  klog
  libqglviewer
  mudlet
  sdrangelove
  sleepyhead
  thumbnailer
  tulip
  
  Of which I already knew tulip was affected. klog and thumbnailer seem
  false positive, making the following candidates of removing arm64
  binaries of:
  
  itksnap
  libqglviewer
  mudlet
  sdrangelove
  sleepyhead
  tulip
  
  Update: To get absolutely everything, I got a list of all binaries
  depending on libqt5core5a, got the source package for them and cross-
  checked. This got me the list of the six above plus the following three:
  
  bino
  qwtplot3d
  vite
  
  However, rebuilding all of the nine resulted in discovery that not all
  that failed on armhf fail on arm64: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-
  service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-035/+packages
  
  The failures for 5 armhf packages seem to be not related to the choice
  of Qt's OpenGL configuration options, so the arm64 builds succeeded (in
  case of itksnap, would have succeeded if not for other FTBFS problem).
  
  --
  Same but for depwait and not ftbfs:
  
  goldencheetah
  openscad
  ovito
  qtconnectivity-opensource-src
  yade

** Description changed:

  Summary of archive operations:
  
  On yakkety, remove arm64 binaries from the following source packages that would now fail the arm64 build if rebuilt:
  bino goldencheetah sdrangelove tulip vite
  
  candidates: openscad ovito yade
  
  --- below is background regarding how the package list was created
  
  Qt build for arm64 recently switched to using OpenGL ES in yakkety,
  similar to armhf.
  
- Currently I've gotten output of packages building against Qt 5
- (qtbase5-dev, qt5-qmake, qtdeclarative5-dev or qt5-default), and a list
- of packages failing to build on armhf (even if failing on other
- architectures) from http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/.
+ I've output of packages building against Qt 5 (qtbase5-dev, qt5-qmake,
+ qtdeclarative5-dev or qt5-default), and a list of packages failing to
+ build on armhf - formerly from from http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/ and
+ then again via launchpadlib.
  
  Combining those results in this list:
  itksnap
  klog
  libqglviewer
  mudlet
  sdrangelove
  sleepyhead
  thumbnailer
  tulip
  
  Of which I already knew tulip was affected. klog and thumbnailer seem
  false positive, making the following candidates of removing arm64
  binaries of:
  
  itksnap
  libqglviewer
  mudlet
  sdrangelove
  sleepyhead
  tulip
  
- Update: To get absolutely everything, I got a list of all binaries
- depending on libqt5core5a, got the source package for them and cross-
- checked. This got me the list of the six above plus the following three:
+ To get absolutely everything, I got a list of all binaries depending on
+ libqt5core5a, got the source package for them and cross-checked. This
+ got me the list of the six above plus the following three:
  
  bino
  qwtplot3d
  vite
  
  However, rebuilding all of the nine resulted in discovery that not all
  that failed on armhf fail on arm64: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-
  service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-035/+packages
  
  The failures for 5 armhf packages seem to be not related to the choice
  of Qt's OpenGL configuration options, so the arm64 builds succeeded (in
  case of itksnap, would have succeeded if not for other FTBFS problem).
  
  --
- Same but for depwait and not ftbfs:
+ Same but for depwait and not ftbfs (list gotten via launchpadlib), cross-checking against libqt5core5a depending packages:
  
- goldencheetah
+ goldencheetah # noticed manually first, but also gotten from this filtering
  openscad
  ovito
  qtconnectivity-opensource-src
  yade

** Description changed:

  Summary of archive operations:
  
  On yakkety, remove arm64 binaries from the following source packages that would now fail the arm64 build if rebuilt:
- bino goldencheetah sdrangelove tulip vite
+ bino goldencheetah sdrangelove ovito tulip vite
  
- candidates: openscad ovito yade
+ candidates: openscad yade
  
  --- below is background regarding how the package list was created
  
  Qt build for arm64 recently switched to using OpenGL ES in yakkety,
  similar to armhf.
  
  I've output of packages building against Qt 5 (qtbase5-dev, qt5-qmake,
  qtdeclarative5-dev or qt5-default), and a list of packages failing to
  build on armhf - formerly from from http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/ and
  then again via launchpadlib.
  
  Combining those results in this list:
  itksnap
  klog
  libqglviewer
  mudlet
  sdrangelove
  sleepyhead
  thumbnailer
  tulip
  
  Of which I already knew tulip was affected. klog and thumbnailer seem
  false positive, making the following candidates of removing arm64
  binaries of:
  
  itksnap
  libqglviewer
  mudlet
  sdrangelove
  sleepyhead
  tulip
  
  To get absolutely everything, I got a list of all binaries depending on
  libqt5core5a, got the source package for them and cross-checked. This
  got me the list of the six above plus the following three:
  
  bino
  qwtplot3d
  vite
  
  However, rebuilding all of the nine resulted in discovery that not all
  that failed on armhf fail on arm64: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-
  service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-035/+packages
  
  The failures for 5 armhf packages seem to be not related to the choice
  of Qt's OpenGL configuration options, so the arm64 builds succeeded (in
  case of itksnap, would have succeeded if not for other FTBFS problem).
  
  --
  Same but for depwait and not ftbfs (list gotten via launchpadlib), cross-checking against libqt5core5a depending packages:
  
  goldencheetah # noticed manually first, but also gotten from this filtering
  openscad
  ovito
  qtconnectivity-opensource-src
  yade

** Also affects: ovito (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Description changed:

  Summary of archive operations:
  
- On yakkety, remove arm64 binaries from the following source packages that would now fail the arm64 build if rebuilt:
+ On yakkety, remove arm64 binaries from the following source packages
+ that would now fail the arm64 build if rebuilt:
+ 
  bino goldencheetah sdrangelove ovito tulip vite
  
  candidates: openscad yade
  
  --- below is background regarding how the package list was created
  
  Qt build for arm64 recently switched to using OpenGL ES in yakkety,
  similar to armhf.
  
  I've output of packages building against Qt 5 (qtbase5-dev, qt5-qmake,
  qtdeclarative5-dev or qt5-default), and a list of packages failing to
  build on armhf - formerly from from http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/ and
  then again via launchpadlib.
  
  Combining those results in this list:
  itksnap
  klog
  libqglviewer
  mudlet
  sdrangelove
  sleepyhead
  thumbnailer
  tulip
  
  Of which I already knew tulip was affected. klog and thumbnailer seem
  false positive, making the following candidates of removing arm64
  binaries of:
  
  itksnap
  libqglviewer
  mudlet
  sdrangelove
  sleepyhead
  tulip
  
  To get absolutely everything, I got a list of all binaries depending on
  libqt5core5a, got the source package for them and cross-checked. This
  got me the list of the six above plus the following three:
  
  bino
  qwtplot3d
  vite
  
  However, rebuilding all of the nine resulted in discovery that not all
  that failed on armhf fail on arm64: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-
  service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-035/+packages
  
  The failures for 5 armhf packages seem to be not related to the choice
  of Qt's OpenGL configuration options, so the arm64 builds succeeded (in
  case of itksnap, would have succeeded if not for other FTBFS problem).
  
  --
  Same but for depwait and not ftbfs (list gotten via launchpadlib), cross-checking against libqt5core5a depending packages:
  
  goldencheetah # noticed manually first, but also gotten from this filtering
  openscad
  ovito
  qtconnectivity-opensource-src
  yade

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
SDK bug tracking, which is subscribed to qtbase-opensource-src in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1586026

Title:
  Remove arm64 binaries for packages failing to build with Qt compiled
  with OpenGL ES

Status in bino package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in goldencheetah package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in ovito package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in sdrangelove package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in tulip package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in vite package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Summary of archive operations:

  On yakkety, remove arm64 binaries from the following source packages
  that would now fail the arm64 build if rebuilt:

  bino goldencheetah sdrangelove ovito tulip vite

  candidates: openscad yade

  --- below is background regarding how the package list was created

  Qt build for arm64 recently switched to using OpenGL ES in yakkety,
  similar to armhf.

  I've output of packages building against Qt 5 (qtbase5-dev, qt5-qmake,
  qtdeclarative5-dev or qt5-default), and a list of packages failing to
  build on armhf - formerly from from http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/
  and then again via launchpadlib.

  Combining those results in this list:
  itksnap
  klog
  libqglviewer
  mudlet
  sdrangelove
  sleepyhead
  thumbnailer
  tulip

  Of which I already knew tulip was affected. klog and thumbnailer seem
  false positive, making the following candidates of removing arm64
  binaries of:

  itksnap
  libqglviewer
  mudlet
  sdrangelove
  sleepyhead
  tulip

  To get absolutely everything, I got a list of all binaries depending
  on libqt5core5a, got the source package for them and cross-checked.
  This got me the list of the six above plus the following three:

  bino
  qwtplot3d
  vite

  However, rebuilding all of the nine resulted in discovery that not all
  that failed on armhf fail on arm64: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-
  ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-035/+packages

  The failures for 5 armhf packages seem to be not related to the choice
  of Qt's OpenGL configuration options, so the arm64 builds succeeded
  (in case of itksnap, would have succeeded if not for other FTBFS
  problem).

  --
  Same but for depwait and not ftbfs (list gotten via launchpadlib), cross-checking against libqt5core5a depending packages:

  goldencheetah # noticed manually first, but also gotten from this filtering
  openscad
  ovito
  qtconnectivity-opensource-src
  yade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bino/+bug/1586026/+subscriptions