ubuntu-tour team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-tour team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00234
Re: Semantics
Ok, thanks. For now I'll get working on an intro to the desktop (what
windows are, what the launcher is, etc). In my opinion our Gnome 2 one
wasn't too good, because it was overly chronological.
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 21:18 +0100, Anthony Stewart wrote:
> I think a mixture of both depending on the context.
>
>
>
> We need tours to explain some of the default applications they may not
> be used to.
>
>
> We also need tours to show them around so that they know roughly what
> to expect. Just simple ones showing how the ui works, telling them
> where the close button is. Obvious as it sounds.
>
>
> We also need tours showing them how to do specific tasks, without
> knowledge of the program. How do they know that firefox is the web
> browser?
>
>
> If you look at the sections, user interface will be a show them
> arround kind of section.
> Applications will be application based, showing them round the default
> apps. Although there will a question tour on how to install
> applications, probably sepparated and slightly larger.
> Common questions will be just that, so questions.
> And the others will probably be a mix.
>
>
> Hope this helps.
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> Anthony
>
>
> On 5 July 2011 03:27, Alexander Lancey <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> So today I finally sat down with the intention of doing stuff
> on the tour. And I had no idea where to start.
>
> What sort of approach are we going for with the tour's
> semantics? So far it's been application based. Are we going
> for question based? What's the approach?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-tour
> Post to : ubuntu-tour@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-tour
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>
>
Follow ups
References