← Back to team overview

ubuntu-tour team mailing list archive

Re: Semantics

 

Ok, thanks. For now I'll get working on an intro to the desktop (what
windows are, what the launcher is, etc). In my opinion our Gnome 2 one
wasn't too good, because it was overly chronological.

On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 21:18 +0100, Anthony Stewart wrote:

> I think a mixture of both depending on the context.
> 
> 
> 
> We need tours to explain some of the default applications they may not
> be used to.
> 
> 
> We also need tours to show them around so that they know roughly what
> to expect. Just simple ones showing how the ui works, telling them
> where the close button is. Obvious as it sounds.
> 
> 
> We also need tours showing them how to do specific tasks, without
> knowledge of the program. How do they know that firefox is the web
> browser?
> 
> 
> If you look at the sections, user interface will be a show them
> arround kind of section.
> Applications will be application based, showing them round the default
> apps. Although there will a question tour on how to install
> applications, probably sepparated and slightly larger.
> Common questions will be just that, so questions.
> And the others will probably be a mix.
> 
> 
> Hope this helps.
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> 
> Anthony
> 
> 
> On 5 July 2011 03:27, Alexander Lancey <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>         So today I finally sat down with the intention of doing stuff
>         on the tour. And I had no idea where to start.
>         
>         What sort of approach are we going for with the tour's
>         semantics? So far it's been application based. Are we going
>         for question based? What's the approach?
>         
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-tour
>         Post to     : ubuntu-tour@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>         Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-tour
>         More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>         
> 
> 
> 


Follow ups

References