ubuntu-x-swat team mailing list archive

[Dylan McCall <dylanmccall@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:36 PM, d3ngar <d3ngar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Why won't Canonical address this  problem? FGLRX is not that uncommon.
> Very few people find Unity a 'suitable' replacement and it's sad to see
> that we are essentially forced to migrate to a different distribution.

Hold on, did you find a distro where the FGLRX driver doesn't have
this issue? Please reply with the distro, its version, and the version
of fglrx. It would be very helpful, because as far as I am aware this
problem is in ATI's hands. If someone has worked around it (even
inadvertently) it would be really helpful.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838577

Title:
  GNOME Shell display problems with FGLRX

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/fglrx/+bug/838577/+subscriptions