ubuntu-x-swat team mailing list archive

[silvagroup <casaba7339-ubuntu@xxxxxxxxx>]

Chirs, your right, and there in lays the problem. But it's our own. I
made the choice tho run 9.04, knowing it would have some possible
problems. So I shouldn't snivel and I now recall that in the download
site it say 8.04 is "ideal for larger deployment", which many of us
means stable. My problem is newcomers into Ubuntu 9.04 see latest
version at the site and so assumes 8.04 means old, which it is. The new
user doesn't know that it also means one is considerably more stable
than the other. Frustration can them continue the mantra that Linux
sucks as an OS which in fact we know it's the best.

Of course this is something to take up in another forum and so I shall. I like the Debian way they simply tell you stable. testing, unstable. And we more knowledgeable users know 9.04 is the testing branch so expect hiccups.
SO SORRY FOR THE WHINING, MY BAD!!!!!

So to bring this full circle that's why there is Launchpad to post the problems so they can address them, as we have.
Thank you for the great work you all do here and please forgive our impassions it's in our nature, or we'd be using 8.04.

-- 
Compiz / vnc screen refresh with nvidia-restricted driver/VirtualBox/ATI fglrx driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353126
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg-server in ubuntu.