ubuntustudio-bugs team mailing list archive

[Ross Gammon <ubuntu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Jeremy,

I didn't go with the transitional package option because the only
reverse dependencies are the ubuntustudio-meta's. If we upload both us-
default-settings and us-meta at about the same time (there is a diff
that drops us-lightdm-theme from the us-meta package attached to the
bug), then we will avoid a build failure on the daily Live-CDs, and get
it all over in one go. I have tested that this works with an "apt-get
dist-upgrade" in my Zesty VM and my ppa.

But I am happy to add a dummy package if that helps find a sponsor!

Cheers,

Ross

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Studio Bugs, which is subscribed to ubuntustudio-meta in Ubuntu.
Matching subscriptions: UbuntuStudioPackages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1630347

Title:
  the lightdm-theme package is practically empty

Status in ubuntustudio-default-settings package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in ubuntustudio-lightdm-theme package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in ubuntustudio-meta package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  The ubuntustudio-lightdm-theme package is now nearly empty, with only
  a configuration file remaining. We should move this config file to
  ubuntustudio-default-settings (which is the natural home for such
  configuration), and remove the lightdm-theme package.

  Krytarik prepared a transition to achieve this, but it was a little
  close to the release date for Yakkety. I reverted this, so that only
  the change to the latest Numix Blue theme was uploaded instead. This
  bug is to remind us to do the transition & removal after Yakkety is
  released.

  Remember to take care to update the seeds and metapackages as well as
  part of the transition.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-default-settings/+bug/1630347/+subscriptions